Which types of evidence can be useful for security control assessments?

In security control assessments, evidence is crucial for evaluating whether the security measures implemented by an organization are effective and compliant with established standards. The correct choice highlights that logs, architectural designs, and test results are all essential forms of evidence.

Logs are critical because they provide records of system activity, which can help assess how controls are functioning in real-time. They track changes, alert on irregular activities, and can indicate whether controls are being bypassed.

Architectural designs are another valuable type of evidence as they give a clear view of the system’s security posture. They show how different components interact, the implementation of security layers, and the overall design principles being applied.

Test results are vital because they demonstrate whether security controls have been effectively validated. They provide empirical proof that security measures work as intended and can help identify areas needing improvement.

Together, these forms of evidence help to create a comprehensive picture of the organization's security posture and play a vital role in informing the assessment process. This contrasts with the other options, which are not as robust or reliable for thorough evaluation during assessments.